ABSTRACT
Background. Hearing dysfunction, caused by the involvement of the vestibulocochlear nerve or by direct damage on inner ear structures has been described in patients with Sjogren's Syndrome (SS). Previous studies evaluating the prevalence and incidence of hearing dysfunction in SS showed conflicting results, therefore, to date, the exact prevalence has not been extensively evaluated. Objectives. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of hearing involvement in patients with primary SS (pSS). Materials and methods. Patients with pSS (AECC criteria) with >=18 years of age attending a dedicated Sjogren's syndrome clinic were consecutively enrolled Auditory function was investigated by pure tone audiometry (PTA), It-Matrix test (Speech Reception Threshold in noise leading to 50% correct sentences-SRT) and the Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI) during a baseline visit and at a follow up visit. A questionnaire of auto-evaluation of hearing loss impact on life was also administered to the patients. Results. Twenty-five patients with pSS (24 females) were enrolled in the study. The median age was 56.2 years (IQR 49-64) The mean disease duration was 3.7 years, 8 were treated with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and 1 with methotrexate. At baseline evaluation PTA revealed hearing loss in 17 patients (68%) with severity ranging from mild to severe. Fifteen patients (60%) presented mild hearing loss, 1(4%) moderate e 1 (4%) severe. The It-Matrix score ranged from -9.9 to 0.9 (median - 3.50). Median HHI score was 12.17 (min 0, max 68, SD 177.9). For Covid restrictions, a follow-up evaluation was available for 10 patients only. In these patients, a worsening of PTA and HHI was observed. Interestingly, the it-Matrix scores of patients with a stable disease showed an improvement. Conclusions. These preliminary findings suggest that hearing involvement is common in patients with SS and that it progresses over time. If confirmed on larger cohorts, these data will be useful for physicians in counseling patients about their disease and, in case of suspicious symptoms, an early evaluation by an otolaryngologist may prevent delay in diagnosis and allow an appropriate diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic intervention.
ABSTRACT
Background: Vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 represent a fundamental tool in controlling the pandemic. To date, data on the safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with rare rheumatic diseases, such as systemic vasculitis, are limited. Objectives: In this study we aimed at evaluating the safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in a multicentric cohort of patients with systemic vasculitis. Methods: Patients with systemic vasculitis from two Rheumatology centres who had received anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were retrospectively examined. The primary outcome was to evaluate, in this multi-centric cohort, the occurence of a disease fare after the administration of the vaccine, defned as development of clinical manifestations related to vasculitis with a concomitant increase in serum infammatory markers. As a secondary outcome we aimed at evaluating, in a monocentric cohort of patients with vasculitis, the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) following vaccine administration compared to healthy controls (HC). Results: We examined 111 patients with systemic vasculitis (n=69 female, n=42 male), with a mean age of 64.3 (± 13) years. Sixty had ANCA-associated vas-culitis (AAV), fourty-two had Giant-Cell Arterities (GCA), five had Periarteritis Nodosa, four had Takayasu's arteritis. One-hundred and five patients received a mRNA vaccine and six a viral vector one. A disease fare occurred in only 2 patients (1.8%) after the frst dose of a mRNA vaccine: both had AAV (microscopic poliangioitis) and developed a pulmunary disease fare (respiratory failure requiring hospitalization and treatment with high-dose glucocorticoids). Of note, one of these patients had multiple previous comorbidities, including a severe COPD. Multivaried analysis, adjusted for age and sex, performed in a single monocentric cohort of patients with systemic vasculitis [n=60 (39 AAV, 21 GCA), 37 female, 23 male, mean age 71 (± 12.5) years] demonstrated a statistically sig-nifcant higher frequency of AEs in vasculitis patients compared to HC (p=0.015) after the frst dose of vaccination. No signifcant differences in the frequency of AEs in vasculitis patients compared to HC after the second dose were detected. All the AEs were mild in both groups (malaise was the most frequently reported);no serious AEs were reported. Conclusion: Our data show a very low incidence of disease fares after the administration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with systemic vasculitis. Patients with systemic vasculitis seem more prone to develop mild AEs after the frst dose of the vaccine. Taken together, this data suggest a good risk profile for anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with systemic vasculitis.